ENTERTAINMENT OVER FACTS, UNACCEPTABLE

Recently I was watching a show on the structures at Nan Madol. These structures are another incident of nobody knows how they were built. Here are a few basic facts for background. Nan Madol is on the Island of Pohnpei in Micronesia. There are around 130 structures built out of Basalt pillars that were believed to have been mined about 25 miles away. The actual date of the building of these structures is believe to be sometime around the 11th to 13th century. It is estimated that 827,000 tons of material was used to build the structures. Some of the stones/pillars are light enough to be carried by hand while others weigh up to 50 tons. And, parts of some of the structures are built in the surrounding sea. As stated above, nobody knows how these structures were built with the limited tools available at the time.

As part of the show they wanted to show what the structure under the water looked like. So, they had a small underwater drone they sent over toward the structure. Well, as the drone approached the structure under the water the video signal from the drone was lost. It just so happened they had another similar drone that was also sent over to the same area of the structure under the ocean and it too lost the video signal. They made it a point to say that both drones had been checked the day before and were operating properly.

Given the signal loss from two underwater drones it was determined that both drones failed due to some type of electro-magnetic (EM) interference from the under the ocean water part of the structure. Considered with the unique aspects and unknowns associated with Nan Madol a secondary conclusion was reached that there had to be some type of ET assistance in building the structures. And, it was further concluded that because the underwater portion of the structure had some type of electro-magnetic charge the ET help had have used some kind of anti-gravity ET technology that charged the Basalt stones.

All things considered the above line of thinking and conclusions make for a legitimate hypothesis. However, there was no testing of this hypothesis even though testing of it could have easily been done, and should have been done, given the adjacent surrounding structures. The failure to test the hypothesis and obtain further evidence regarding ET involvement in the building of the structures was a significant error. This missed evidentiary opportunity can result in significant questioning of any further conclusions associated with Nan Madol and ET involvement.

As for testing the hypothesis/conclusions stated in the show, if alien anti-gravity technology was used for the underwater part of the structures and contaminated these Basalt columns, then it was also used for the above water portions of the structure. If the ET anti-gravity technology resulted in an EM charge to the underwater portion of the structure, then it should have also caused an EM charge to the above water portions of the structure. Testing for this EM contamination could have been done by simply turning the drone on and walking up to above water wall and see if this area of the wall caused the drone signal to fail. This simple test could have been done all over the Nan Madol area. At the very least the quarry where the Basalt columns was believed to have been mined should have also been tested to verify there was nothing associated with the area of the mining that could have caused the EM charge to the underwater Basalt used for the construction.

There is a secondary evidentiary issue regarding the EM conclusion for the Basalt columns, always make sure that there is no contamination of your evidence. So, you have Basalt columns under ocean water that you are trying to view but you cannot because your underwater drones keep losing signal and your conclusion is that the Basalt columns have an EM charge due to being put into place by alien anti-gravitational technology. So what does sea water have that fresh water does not have? Salt. Salt is an ionic compound, meaning it has an extra electric charge. So if the underwater Basalt columns do in fact have an EM charge isn’t the most likely reason due to the constant sea water motion around the columns?

Let’s recap;

Two underwater drones that were working failed when they get near Basalt columns that are under sea water.

The conclusion is these columns picked up an EM charge and this is what is caused the drones to fail.

Because of the unique characteristics of the structures that are underwater and their age, the conclusion is that the Basalt columns had to have been put into place by alien anti-gravity technology.

This conclusion can easily be tested by testing nearby columns above the sea water, and testing at the quarry site. However, no verification testing is done.

And, the fact that these columns are under salt water which could account for the EM charge is never considered.

Put all of these things together and you have evidence contamination by the salt water surrounding the Basalt columns in question that could have caused any EM charge on the underwater columns. And, no side testing was done which could have easily confirmed or denied the EM charge on the underwater columns.

The issue of alien and UFO visitation is a very important topic with respect to today’s physics and science so it needs to be investigated completely and more important legitimately. Reporting rushed, unsupported, untested conclusions based on contaminated evidence for the sake of audience entertainment only degrades this important topic. The UFO community deserves and is entitled to much better than this. Furthermore, the unique overall design and history of the Nan Madol structures speak for themselves. They do not need sloppy and incomplete work to try and justify a pre-existing conclusion. In other words, the UFO and ET community already has an uphill fight for legitimacy; do not make this fight any harder for the sake of entertainment.

I believe that there is change afoot in the scientific community. My position has always been that when it comes to UFOs and ETs today’s scientists should not be saying they are impossible, rather they should be asking what do those flying the UFOs know that I don’t. Pushing entertainment over facts only sets back the coming changes in physics and the sciences.